A four-word book review
Let's talk about the most important four-word book review in recent memory.
Marc Andreessen, cofounder of a16z, manager of tens of billions in tech investments, a man who has shaped how tech thinks for three decades, read Tyler Cowen's new book ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ต ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ถ๐ป๐ด and responded: "Self-recommending. Subscribe now!"
Four words. Subscribe now. Moving on.
I read it and opened another Claude tab. As one does
๐๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ฏ๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ป ๐ณ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐, because what Cowen is actually saying is: we're automating our ability to know when AI is wrong about the economy, and calling it progress.
William Stanley Jevons, ๐ถ๐ป ๐ญ๐ด๐ณ๐ญ, didn't just invent marginalism, the framework underlying all of modern economics. He built the empirical program inside it: statistics, measurement, data. That program attracted smart people who did work that didn't need the framework. Then machine learning arrived.
๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฐ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ pitted a 360,000-factor model against the traditional 6-factor model. The 360,000-factor version won. It cut pricing errors by 54.8 percent. Nobody can explain what 359,994 of those factors mean. The field published a paper, in its own house, saying it no longer needs the house.
Steve Levitt quit academic economics at 57. ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐๐, the man who made economics readable to people who don't voluntarily read economics, said on his way out: "Chicago price theory has essentially lost. Lost to posterity at this point."
๐ ๐ถ๐น๐๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป said the same thing in the 1990s. Nobody listened.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐จ๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ด๐ผ now runs a summer camp. The Price Theory Summer Camp, "created to introduce PhD students from outside the University of Chicago to price theory." PhD students. Summer camp. In the subject that used to be the core curriculum of a PhD.
๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ theorist posted publicly that "economic intuition" now means "math introduced to economics more than 20 years ago." A senior economist at another major program replied: "Intuition, Shmintuition, look at the proof."
When GPS fails, in a tunnel or after a solar event or during signal jamming, the sailor who never learned celestial navigation has no backup.
We are producing a generation of policy analysts who will inherit 360,000-factor models they cannot audit, making decisions affecting people who never chose the model, in domains where being wrong doesn't show up in a quarterly report.
๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ป'๐ ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ: "Maybe our intuitions about the world were never so strong in the first place... swimming in a larger froth of epistemic chaos. And now the illusion has been stripped bare."
Andreessen read that.
I read it and opened another Claude tab.
Nobody's building the backup. Right now, it's getting four words.